x
preaknessstakes
#
It's a Win-Win
On a rainy morning in September 2004, Keeneland president Nick Nicholson stood at the edge of the track's five-eighths-mile training oval clutching a handful of wax-coated fibers and said, "Go ahead. Take a handful. I don't want this on the record, but this could be the future of racing."

The future is now.

The mixture that Nicholson held that day was taken from the training track's newly installed synthetic racing surface called Polytrack, which Keeneland manufactures in a partnership with its English developer, Martin Collins. By the end of 2007, at least eight major racetracks in North America are expected to race over Polytrack or surfaces like it, such as the widely praised Tapeta surface developed by the trainer Michael Dickinson. Turfway Park in northern Kentucky, which is owned in partnership by Keeneland, became the first American track to install Polytrack on its main course in 2005, and projects are under way to install Polytrack on Keeneland's main course and at Woodbine Racecourse in Toronto. In addition, Dickinson's Tapeta surface is being installed at Fair Hill training center in Maryland.

More significantly, the California Horse Racing Board, emboldened by a tenfold reduction in the catastrophic-injury rate at Turfway, has passed a rule requiring all five of the state's major racetracks - Bay Meadows Race Course, Del Mar, Golden Gate Fields, Hollywood Park, and Santa Anita - to replace their dirt courses with synthetic surfaces by the end of 2007. The total cost, according to California racing officials, could exceed $40 million.

The move to artificial racing surfaces underscores the Thoroughbred industry's increasing sensitivity to racing-related injuries, a concern that has been amplified by the career-ending breakdown suffered by Kentucky Derby winner Barbaro in this year's Preakness Stakes. Supporters of the synthetic surfaces contend that artificial tracks are far kinder to racehorses and jockeys, can better withstand temperature variations and precipitation, and are far less expensive to maintain than conventional dirt tracks.

Although horsemen have generally praised the artificial surfaces, some have complained about the amount of fiber that gets kicked up during races, and others have quietly grumbled that current training methods to emphasize speed are not sufficient to prepare a horse over the generally slower engineered material. So despite the benefits, support for artificial surfaces is not unanimous, and some racetracks are taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Churchill Downs, for example, has no plans to install an artificial surface at any of its five tracks, but the company will monitor the latest installations, according to a Churchill spokeswoman, Julie Koenig Loignon.

"The safety of our two-legged and four-legged athletes is paramount to us, but we'd like to see first how these surfaces hold up over time," Koenig Loignon said.

Some horseplayers have criticized the move to artificial surfaces for failing to take into account concerns about handicapping. Others have decried the potential loss to the sport's historical record, contending that comparisons with the great performances over conventional dirt tracks will be rendered meaningless because the manufactured surfaces yield slower times. Still others have cast doubt on the results from Turfway, contending that one meet's worth of data, while impressive, should not form the basis of a decision that has the potential to uproot so many traditions and training methods.

Richard Shapiro, the chairman of the California Horse Racing Board, said that the board had heard all of those criticisms before voting unanimously on May 25 - six days after Barbaro was injured on Pimlico's dirt course - to require the synthetic surfaces.

"These are all legitimate issues, and I can sympathize with the people making the complaints," Shapiro said. "But for me, the bottom line is that the health of the horse has to come first. When you look at the data on breakdowns, it's unacceptable. It's staggering. We had 227 horses destroyed on our tracks in 2005. And that doesn't count soft-tissue injuries or bowed tendons or suspensories."

Racetrack officials in California have at the very least accepted the decision, and some have embraced it. Officials at the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club expect its 2006 meet will be its last to feature a conventional dirt surface, according to Craig Fravel, the executive vice president of the track, and is close to signing a contract with Keeneland for Polytrack, according to Keeneland officials. Magna Entertainment Corp., the owner of Santa Anita Park and Golden Gate Fields, is also close to choosing a vendor. Even the Bay Meadows Land Co., the owner of Bay Meadows and Hollywood Park - two sites that could be developed for purposes other than racing in the near future - is intent on installing the artificial surfaces.

"I was surprised at the action the CHRB took, in light of the financial burden on the entire industry," said Jack Liebau, the president of Bay Meadows and Hollywood Park, who said that each installation would cost $8 million to $10 million. "But let me also say that I understand and appreciate the motivation. The concern is for the safety of the horses. That's perfectly understandable. And we know that the advantages of the surfaces are pretty apparent. They are kinder to horses, and they reduce injuries. That much we know for sure."

During the recent Turfway Park winter-spring meet, the track reported, three horses suffered catastrophic breakdowns over the artificial surface, compared with 24 the previous meet over dirt. Turfway canceled no racing days because of poor track conditions in the 2005-06 meet compared with 11 cancellations during the 2004-05 meet, a statistic credited to the artificial surface's resiliency in adverse weather.

Installing artificial surfaces is no easy project. The dirt track has to be completely removed, including the base, so that a drainage system can be installed. A layer of loose stones is laid around and over the drainage pipes, and that layer is covered by a four- to six-inch layer of tarmac chunks. Next comes the artificial surface itself, which, regardless of manufacturer, is typically composed of water-repellent, wax-coated natural and synthetic fibers, including pieces of shredded rubber, usually seven to eight inches deep.

Installation, however, does not typically stop at the racetrack itself. Contamination by dirt or other particles can compromise the consistency of the surface, so dirt pathways leading to the track have to be sequestered or overlaid with the artificial surface. Officials from racetracks that have had artificial surfaces said privately that the surfaces are not maintenance-free; in fact, many of the tracks need to be watered depending on the relative humidity, and most of the artificial surfaces now in use are harrowed at least once a day.

Four companies are vying for the California racetrack business: Martin Collins Surfaces and Footings, the Polytrack manufacturer; Tapeta Footings; Stabilizer Solutions, a surface-materials company in Phoenix; and Equestrian Solutions, a British company. Officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the competitive nature of the bidding said that Polytrack and Tapeta are the two top candidates for the California tracks.

California racing officials said that little distinguished the artificial surfaces from each other, although manufacturers of the surfaces likely use different ratios for the ingredients in the topmost layer. In addition, the manufacturers also use slightly different drainage systems, although those systems will differ most because of the underlying conditions at the racetrack.

The competition between Tapeta and Polytrack has become intense, considering the rapid run-up in potential orders for the surfaces and the millions of dollars involved in a typical installation. Polytrack beat out Tapeta at Woodbine, but Tapeta got the contract for Fair Hill. According to the California racing officials, Polytrack is being favored for Bay Meadows and Hollywood Park, in addition to Del Mar.

The competition has a twist. Dickinson holds the U.S. patent, granted in 1998, on a critical part of the manufacturing process, wax coating, and Polytrack has had to license the process from Tapeta. So Dickinson's company receives fees from his competitor, although Dickinson would not disclose the amount. Keeneland officials confirmed that they purchased a license from Dickinson based on the patent.

California racing officials said that when they first explored the artificial surfaces, they had doubts about the ability of existing artificial surfaces to handle a warm climate. But the officials said those doubts were quickly dispelled as they realized that even in Southern California, the temperatures do not exceed those of a Kentucky or Maryland summer, where artificial surfaces have been in use for years on training tracks.

"I really don't think we're going to have any problems with the heat," said Ron Charles, the president of Santa Anita. "What I'm most concerned about is the number of horses we will be sending over the track. We train during the morning, year-round, and we run in the afternoon. Will the surface hold up?"

Dickinson, ticking off government statistics describing the range of weather conditions his training track has endured over the past eight years in Elk Neck, Md., said that California weather would not pose a problem to Tapeta.

"If you're asking me whether or not I'm going to change anything to deal with the California weather, the answer is absolutely not," Dickinson said. "Does it ever get to 110 degrees, or minus 17? Do they get hurricanes? Do they ever get 12 inches of rain in 12 hours?"

Dickinson, whose confidence in his product comes from working with the surface for 12 years, dismissed any concerns about the Tapeta surface standing up to the heavy traffic of the California tracks. No material was added to the Tapeta Farm surface for the first four years after it was installed; since then, Dickinson said, he "invigorates" the track once every year with new material constituting perhaps "1 to 2 percent" of the total volume.

Jim Pendergest, the general manager of Martin Collins Surfaces and Footings, said that the traffic on California tracks should also pose no problem to Polytrack, citing training yards in England where the surface has been installed for years.

"On a horse-by-square-foot basis, we're talking about numbers that far exceed anything the California tracks can put out there, and the surface has held up extremely well," Pendergest said.

Both Tapeta and Keeneland plan to use mobile manufacturing facilities in their installations. The Tapeta processing is contained in three 53-foot tractor trailers that Dickinson calls the "most state-of-the-art" process. Keeneland uses two trailers - one for the mixer, which resembles a large agricultural feed mixer, according to Pendergest, and the other for the wax-coating machinery.

"When you're dealing with 12,000 tons of sand, and a total of 16,000 tons of surface materials, it's a lot easier to move the factory than to ship everything across the country," Dickinson said.

While Dickinson said that he does not expect to modify his mixture for any California installations, Pendergest said that Keeneland would modify the ratio of ingredients in its Polytrack mixture by adding less fiber and rubber to the mix and more sand. The wax coating will also be thicker, Pendergest said, to minimize kickback and speed up the track.

"From all our discussions out there, it seems they want something a little faster, something a little more compact" than the track at Turfway, Pendergest said of the California racetracks.

When asked whether a more compact and faster surface could mitigate the surface's ability to prevent injuries, Pendergest said that the minor modifications should not matter, but that Polytrack officials would watch closely for any variations in performance that could indicate a need for additional changes.

In any case, the California Horse Racing Board will be looking over the tracks' shoulders. Dr. Rick Arthur, the CHRB's new equine medical director, is designing a system that will attempt to catalog injuries over the artificial surfaces compared with injuries suffered over dirt surfaces. The system will rely on data from local clinics about the numbers of X-rays and surgeries performed, as well as the data that the board already collects through its mandatory necropsy program for any horse that dies in a racing enclosure.

Arthur said that he will take no role in determining which artificial surface the tracks install. But when racing begins, he said he plans to closely monitor the results, all with an eye on safety.

"It's going to be the tracks' decisions as far as which surface they go with," Arthur said. "It's going to be my job to make sure that the [surfaces] are doing what we want them to do, which is reduce injuries."

Across the county, other tracks will be watching. Charles Hayward, the chief executive officer of the New York Racing Association, which operates Aqueduct, Belmont Park, and Saratoga Racecourse, said that the association will decide early next year whether to include in its bid to renew its franchise a plan to install artificial surfaces on the Aqueduct inner track, which is used in the winter, and the Belmont Park training track.

NYRA - which has struggled with cash flow problems and recently negotiated a $30 million loan package from the state - can't afford the $15 million price tag to install the two surfaces now, nor can it take any action before its franchise expires at the end of 2007. But Hayward said that after three visits to Keeneland and Turfway, he's convinced that artificial surfaces will be a solid element in racing's future.

"This is probably one of those rare situations where you can say it's a win-win," Hayward said.

No replies - reply
 
#
Surgeries have Barbaro on road to recovery

On Monday, Dr. Dean Richardson replaced a pair of bent screws and implanted three new ones in the Kentucky Derby winner's right hind leg. Richardson also changed the colt's cast.

 

Two weeks after winning the Derby on May 6, Barbaro broke down in the Preakness Stakes, shattering his leg and ending his racing career.

The initial surgery May 21 for life-threatening injuries had Richardson placing 27 screws and a compression plate in the leg. Barbaro has been in intensive care at the George D. Widener Hospital for Large Animals at the University of Pennsylvania's New Bolton Center in Kennett Square, Pa.

Even though Barbaro isn't out of danger, X-rays show Barbaro's joints are fusing and the breaks healing.

"This is about the time we expect to see good evidence on radiographs of a degree of healing, and the X-rays that were taken (Monday), they look very, very good," Richardson told the Daily Racing Form. "As far as the major fracture, basically, it could not look better.

"He's really progressing well as far as the fracture goes."

Barbaro won his first six starts, including a 6 1/2 -length victory in the Kentucky Derby with jockey Edgar Prado for trainer Michael Matz. Barbaro entered the Preakness Stakes as the heavy favorite, but broke his leg in three places around the ankle shortly after the start.

Should Barbaro continue to improve, the injury will not prevent him from breeding and his stud value is expected to be high.

No replies - reply
 
#
Saratoga simulcast signal headed to raceway

As part of a deal to increase stall space for the 137th Saratoga Race Course season, the New York Racing Association has agreed to allow its simulcast signal into Saratoga Gaming and Raceway, officials announced Monday.

The agreement marks the first time the Saratoga Race Course wagering signal will be available in Saratoga County other than at the racetrack.

"Nothing beats the experience of being at the races at Saratoga Race Course," NYRA President and CEO Charles Hayward said. "But with some fans only having two weeks of vacation a year who might not otherwise be able to get to the track, now they can pop in at the raceway and get their bets down."

As part of the agreement, Saratoga Gaming and Raceway will make 47 stalls available to NYRA for the thoroughbred meet.

NYRA became interested in the raceway stalls after NYRA expanded its security barn area, adding the stalls in barn 29 to those in barns 27 and 28, giving NYRA 82 stalls in permanent barns. An additional 20 temporary stalls will again be used to sequester horses scheduled to race on that day’s card.

 

The simulcast agreement was one of a several topics discussed at NYRA’s annual pre-Saratoga Race Course press conference held at The Desmond.

In addition to the simulcast deal and the unveiling of the six giveaway items during this year’s meeting (opening day is July 26), NYRA confirmed it will be involved in the bidding process to keep its racing franchise to conduct racing at the state's three primary thoroughbred racetracks (Aqueduct, Belmont Park and Saratoga), which is to expire on Dec. 31, 2007.

NYRA, a nonprofit entity, also announced it will likely take on a for-profit partner when it submits its bid.

NYRA is also taking on a race sponsor for the first time at Saratoga, with Darley attaching its name to The Test Stakes.

Darley is the breeding and racing operation of Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai. Darley is part of the umbrella that includes Shadwell Stable -- the owners of Belmont Stakes winner Jazil, as well as Preakness Stakes winner Bernardini.

As part of the sponsorship, fans will be able to enter a drawing for an all-expenses paid trip to the Dubai World Cup in 2007.

Both Jazil and Bernardini are expected to be major players in the Travers Stakes -- the marquee races of the 36-day Saratoga summer meet.

The 1 1/4-mile Grade I, $1 million Travers Stakes, to be run on Aug. 26 as part of an 11-race card that will feature the 7-furlong King’s Bishop, is expected to play a major role in determining the champion 3-year-old colt of 2006.

With Kentucky Derby winner Barbaro retired because of injury and Bernardini and Jazil splitting the final two legs of the Triple Crown, the Travers winner will take the divisional lead.

NYRA has also moved the Woodward Stakes -- a Grade I stakes race for handicap horses -- from the first week of Belmont’s fall championship meet to the final weekend of the Saratoga meet. In addition, the Spinaway and Hopeful stakes have been returned to their traditional closing week placement, making the final week of racing after the Travers relevant again. Saratoga will run 14 Grade I races over its 36 days of racing.

The movement of the Woodward will give last year’s Jim Dandy and Travers winner Flower Alley an opportunity for an unprecedented Saratoga record. Only Medaglia d’Oro has won the Whitney, Travers and Jim Dandy. Flower Alley has the opportunity to win the Whitney and Woodward.

The annual Saratoga giveaways include a Todd Pletcher bobblehead doll on July 27, a Saratoga baseball cap on July 30, a Saratoga T-shirt on Aug. 6, a sports bag on Aug. 13, a travel mug on Aug. 20 and a stadium blanket on Sept. 3.

On those busy giveaway days, NYRA has also created an express line for fans who do not want the giveaway, but just want to get into the track.

In addition to a rewards program for NYRA’s highest rollers, there will also be a new wager available, called the Grand Slam. The four-race wager, culminating with the feature every day, requires bettors to pick a horse to hit the board in the first three legs before picking the winning horse in the fourth leg.

ESPN and ABC will televise 12 races from Saratoga this summer, staring July 29 with the Diana and Jim Dandy.

Steeplechasing will be back, but on a limited basis, with only six steeplechases to be run -- all on Thursdays. Five of the six races will be the first race of the card, with the Grade I New York Turfwriters Cup the featured race on Aug. 31.

Giveaway schedule

July 27 -- Todd Pletcher Bobblehead

July 30 -- Saratoga baseball cap

Aug. 6 -- Saratoga T-shirt

Aug. 13 -- Saratoga sports bag

Aug. 20 -- Saratoga travel mug

Sept. 3 -- Saratoga stadium blanket

No replies - reply
 
#
New wagering device for California sparks debate
It looks like a video game. It contains clips of 250,000 horse races run over the past several years. And, according to the owners of Arkansas' only thoroughbred racing track, it saved the thoroughbred industry there.

Instant Racing, a new way to wager on horse races, is permitted in just two states: Arkansas and Oregon. But California could become the third if a new bill by Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Leland Yee,

D-San Francisco, is approved by the Legislature.

AB 2409, which is due for a hearing in August, has drawn the ire of the San Mateo City Council, whose members oppose the idea of expanded gambling at Bay Meadows Racecourse. Proponents argue that the bill will provide a financial boost to California's beleaguered racetracks and stop the flow of talented horses out of the state, as owners and trainers seek bigger paydays at more lucrative venues.

Oaklawn Park, in Hot Springs, Ark., is one such track, drawing top-flight thoroughbreds from around the country to its spring races. In 2004, Smarty Jones won the Rebel Stakes and Arkansas Derby at Oaklawn before taking the Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes, falling just short of the Triple Crown. The next year Afleet Alex won the Arkansas Derby, then went on to capture the Preakness and the Belmont Stakes.

That was a major turnaround from the late 1990s, when pressure from Indian and corporate casinos in neighboring states had pushed Oaklawn to the brink of collapse, said Louis Cella, Oaklawn's executive vice president. Desperate to boost revenues, Oaklawn executives teamed up with AmTote International, a Maryland-based company that makes bet-totaling machines, to create a new generation of wagering device.

The result was Instant Racing, a game that allows bettors to place wagers on past races. Built like a self-service betting terminal, but outfitted with flashy graphics, the machines show patrons handicapping information on anonymous 10-horse races, including the winning percentages of the jockeys, trainers and horses involved. Once they place their bets, customers watch the actual race, with the option of viewing either the entire lap or the final furlong.

Like bets on live races, the wagers are parimutuel, meaning the winnings that are paid out fluctuate according to the number of people participating in the pool and how much they bet. Instant Racing players compete for money against the other gamers using the system.

Oaklawn introduced Instant Racing machines in 2000 and has watched its revenues grow every year, said Cella, who estimated that purses for Oaklawn's live races will increase from a total of $12 million this year to $15 million in 2007.

"We were like Santa Anita and Hollywood and every other park in California: going in the wrong direction," Cella said.

The track that Cella's great-grandfather built in 1904 was in danger of becoming "a rinky-dink county fair," he said.

Now the park is attracting a new set of customers who are younger and better educated than its traditional clientele. The track took a survey and was surprised by what respondents told them.

"We were shocked, but delighted," Cella said. "They said, 'It's cool to go there now.'"

Owners of California tracks, including Bay Meadows, need the kind cash infusion that Instant Racing could provide, according to supporters of AB 2409. Forced to compete with tracks in more than a dozen states that are allowed to operate slot machines and other forms of alternative gaming, California tracks must adapt to avoid being wiped out, industry representatives say.

"The voters and the Legislature have said no when it comes to adding slot machines at racetracks," Yee said in announcing the bill. "Our plan goes a different route by creatively saving horse racing with horse racing. This does not expand gaming, but simply provides a new and exciting way for parimutuel wagering."

But to the bill's critics, including San Mateo Mayor John Lee, Instant Racing terminals are merely slot machines in disguise.

"You put money in; you push a button. You have a slot machine, in my opinion," said Lee. "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, acts like a duck, yeah, it's a slot machine to me."

Lee pointed to a decision by the Wyoming Supreme Court, which ruled May 4 that the Wyoming Pari-Mutuel Commission exceeded its authority in allowing Wyoming Downs to install Instant Racing machines at four off-track betting locations in 2004.

"We agree ... that we are not dealing with new technology here, we are dealing with a slot machine that attempts to mimic traditional parimutuel wagering," the court concluded.

But to Frank Lamb, executive director of the Wyoming Pari-Mutuel Commission, the court simply got it wrong. Lamb said the conservative court took a narrow view of Wyoming law, which prohibits any "gambling devices." By that standard, the court also should have invalidated the off-track betting terminals that allow for wagering on simulcast races, but it didn't, said Lamb. He added that, in 18 months of operation, the Instant Racing machines provided Wyoming Downs with a significant boost in revenues.

There is a clear difference between a slot machine, which determines winners courtesy of a random number generator, and Instant Racing, said Cella. By using the handicapping information provided in the form of pie graphs, Instant Racing bettors can increase their odds of picking a winner from 10-1 to 7-1, he said.

Legal advisers for the California Legislature agree, determining that, unlike a slot machine, which is a "game of chance," Instant Racing qualifies as a "game of skill."

The creators of Instant Racing design their machines to look like video games to make them more accessible to new users, but that doesn't make them slot machines, said Drew Cuoto, president of the Thoroughbred Owners of California.

"I can dress up a vending machine like a slot machine. I can put lights and bells and a pull arm on a vending machine. But at the end of the day, it's still a vending machine that has been made to look like a slot machine for marketing purposes," Cuoto said.

But the game's appearance, combined with its swift rate of play, could be a dangerous combination for certain gamblers, said Jeff Marotta, the problem-gambling services manager for the Oregon Human Services Department. Marotta familiarized himself with Instant Racing when Portland Meadows installed the machines in 2003. The track's owner, Magna Entertainment Corp., removed the machines in 2004 but may reinstall them this year.

Marotta said he worried by Instant Racing's "speed of play," which permits users to engage in one game after another in rapid succession. "One of the concerns I had was, we know that games that offer more of a rapid-rewards system are kind of more potent when it comes to developing problems (with) them," he said.

With their quick style of play and entrancing electronic displays, slot machines "seem to have this ability to allow people to engage in a form of escape — some people call it dissociation — where they really kind of get pulled into it," Marotta said.

Marotta said a problem Oregon regulators had in grappling with Instant Racing was that the game didn't fit neatly into existing regulations. Cella said the issue is that, though he considers Instant Racing a parimutuel wagering device, at the same time it represents something altogether new.

"It's totally different," Cella said. "Who knows what's going to happen next year? Our industry must evolve to survive."

No replies - reply
 
Calendar

November 2009
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

July 2006
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031


Recent Visitors

April 7th
google

March 28th
google

March 19th
google

March 9th
google

February 28th
google

February 17th
google

February 7th
google

January 28th
google

January 19th
google

January 9th
google

January 1st
google

December 24th
google

December 20th
google